New York State Basic Emergency Medical Technician (EMT-B) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the New York State EMT-B Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each featuring hints and explanations. Boost your readiness for your exam!

Practice this question and more.


Which of the following would NOT be a reason for minor consent to be waived?

  1. Being married

  2. Being pregnant

  3. Having a legal guardian present

  4. Being financially independent

The correct answer is: Having a legal guardian present

The reasoning behind the notion that having a legal guardian present would not be a reason for minor consent to be waived is rooted in the legal framework governing minors and medical consent. In general, minors are typically not permitted to give informed consent for medical treatment themselves. However, in situations where a legal guardian is present, they are generally able to provide consent on behalf of the minor. This means that the presence of a legal guardian does not remove the need for consent from the guardian; it actually reinforces it, as the guardian holds the legal right to make decisions for the minor. In contrast, circumstances such as being married, being pregnant, or being financially independent often invoke exceptions to standard consent requirements for minors. For instance, a married minor may have the same legal status as an adult concerning medical decisions. Similarly, a pregnant minor is often granted the right to consent to certain medical procedures related to her pregnancy, recognizing her unique circumstances. Being financially independent might also suggest that a minor has taken on adult responsibilities, allowing for greater autonomy in decision-making. Thus, the presence of legal guardianship signifies that another entity is responsible for giving consent for medical treatment, rather than waiving the minor's need for consent.